Selected literature

Original on Original

In recent years, more and more third-party manufacturers have copied prosthetic components and claim compatibility with those of original implant systems. At first glance the design of these non-original abutments seems to be equivalent to the corresponding original abutment. In fact, however, there are differences which cannot be discovered from the outside inspection, but can be visualized in a cross section of the implant-abutment system. Above all, original prosthetic components show excellent long-term success and survival in clinical situations.

No guarantee of completeness.

Micromorphological differences of the implant-abutment junction and in vitro load testing for three different titanium abutments on Straumann tissue level implants. Mattheos N, Larsson C, Ma L, Fokas G, Chronopoulos V, Janda M. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2017 Apr 11. 

An In Vitro Evaluation of the Loosening of Different Interchangeable Abutments in Internal-Connection-Type Implants. Park JM, Baek CH, Heo SJ, Kim SK, Koak JY, Kim SK, Belser UC. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2017 Mar/Apr;32(2):350-355. 

Investigating the micromorphological differences of the implant-abutment junction and their clinical implications: a pilot study. Mattheos N, Li X, Zampelis A, Ma L, Janda M. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2016 Nov;27(11):e134-e143

Implants with original and non-original abutment connections. Gigandet M, Bigolin G, Faoro F, Bürgin W, Brägger U. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2014 Apr;16(2):303-11. 

Exotic encounters with dental implants: managing. Mattheos N, Janda MS. Aust Dent J. 2012 Jun;57(2):236-42. 

Screw loosening with interchangeable abutments in internally connected implants after cyclic loading. Kim SK, Koak JY, Heo SJ, Taylor TD, Ryoo S, Lee SY. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2012 Jan-Feb;27(1):42-7.