Nos priorités : Implant Health

Solution à vie.

Comme pour une dent naturelle, la plaque bactérienne peut s’accumuler sur la base des implants dentaires et conduire à une inflammation des tissus mous et durs environnants. À Straumann Group, notre priorité est le développement de solutions pour prévenir, diagnostiquer et traiter la péri-implantite.

  • Environnement péri-implantaire sain¹˙²⁴

    Garantir un traitement à long terme réussi et prédictible, et bénéficier de solutions cliniquement éprouvées.

  • Options de traitement élargies

    Offrir une gamme plus large de solutions de traitement et de services dentaires pour prévenir, diagnostiquer et traiter la péri-implantite.

  • Économies de temps et d’argent

    Réduire la complexité grâce à une solution unique et des recommandations de traitement. Faciliter l’acceptation des patients pour les rappels et l’entretien au domicile.

En savoir plus sur Implant Health

Nous contacter

Accord sur l’utilisation des données*
Veuillez saisir à nouveau le code ci-dessus

Téléchargements

Documents

Aucun contenu médiatique trouvé.
Voir tous les contenus médiatiques...

Preuves scientifiques

Aucun contenu médiatique trouvé.

Articles youTooth

Catalogues

International Course Calendar 2020

More than education
490.150/en/F/00 08/20 24.08.2020 PDF, 6 MB Télécharger

Catalogue Des Produits 2019/2020

Straumann Édition internationale - interactive
453.200/fr/D/00 07/19 15.11.2019 PDF, 15 MB Télécharger
Voir tous les contenus médiatiques...

Bibliographie

1 Gahlert M, Roehling S, Sprecher CM, Kniha H, Milz S, Bormann K. In vivo performance of zirconia and titanium implants: a histomorphometric study in mini pig maxillae. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012 Mar;23(3):281-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02157.x. Epub 2011 Aug 2.
2 Bormann KH et al. ‘Biomechanical evaluation of a microstructured zirconia implant by a removal torque comparison with a standard Ti-SLA implant.’ Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 23, 2012, 1210–1216
3 Gahlert M1, Röhling S, Wieland M, Eichhorn S, Küchenhoff H, Kniha H A comparison study of the osseointegration of zirconia and titanium dental implants. A biomechanical evaluation in the maxilla of pigs Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2010 Dec;12(4):297-305. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2009.00168.x.
4 Gahlert M1, Kniha H, Weingart D, Schild S, Gellrich NC, Bormann KH. A prospective clinical study to evaluate the performance of zirconium dioxide dental implants in single-tooth gaps. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2015 Apr 1. doi: 10.1111/clr.12598.
5 Janner SFM, Gahlert M, Bosshardt DD, Roehling S, Milz S, Higginbottom F, Buser D, Cochran DL Bone response to functionally loaded, two-piece zirconia implants: A preclinical histometric study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018 Mar;29(3):277-289. doi: 10.1111/clr.13112. Epub 2017 Dec 30.
6 Bormann KH, Gellrich NC, Kniha H, Schild S, Weingart D, Gahlert M.; A prospective clinical study to evaluate the performance of zirconium dioxide dental implants in single-tooth edentulous area: 3-year follow-up.; BMC Oral Health. 2018 Nov 1;18(1):181. doi: 10.1186/s12903-018-0636-x.
7 Roehling S, Astasov-Frauenhoffer M, Hauser-Gerspach, Braissant O, Woelfler H, et a., In Vitro Biofilm Formation On Titanium And Zirconia Implant Surfaces, J of Periodont DOI: 10.1902/jop.2016.160245
8 Linares A, Grize L, Munoz F, Pippenger BE, Dard M, Domken O, Blanco-Carrion J. Histological assessment of hard and soft tissues surrounding a novel ceramic implant: a pilot study in the minipig. J Clin Periodontol 2016; 43: 538–546
9 Buser D, Janner SF, Wittneben JG, Brägger U, Ramseier CA, Salvi GE. 10-year survival and success rates of 511 titanium implants with a sandblasted and acid-etched surface: a retrospective study in 303 partially edentulous patients. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2012 Dec;14(6):839-51.
10 Roccuzzo M, Bonino L, Dalmasso P, Aglietta M. Long-term results of a three arms prospective cohort study on implants in periodontally compromised patients: 10-year data around sand-blasted and acid-etched (SLA) surface. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2014 Oct;25(10):1105-12
11 van Velzen FJ et al Clin Oral Implants Res. 2014 Nov 5.
12 Fischer K, Stenberg T.: Prospective 10-year cohort study based on a randomized controlled trial (RCT) on implant-supported full-arch maxillary prostheses. Part 1: sandblasted and acid-etched implants and mucosal tissue. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2012 Dec;14(6):808-15
13 J. Derks*, J. Håkansson, J.L. Wennström, C. Tomasi, M. Larsson, and T. Berglundh Effectiveness of Implant Therapy Analyzed in a Swedish Population – Early and Late Implant Loss Published online before print December 11, 2014, doi: 10.1177/0022034514563077 JDR December 11, 2014 0022034514563077  >>>
14 Bormann KH, Gellrich NC,Kniha H, Schild S, Weingart D, GahlertM. A Prospective Clinical Study to Evaluate the Performance ofZirconium Dioxide Dental Implants in Single Tooth Gaps in theMaxilla and Mandible: 5-Year Results. Publication in preparation2017. manuscript in preparation
15 Alomrani AN, Hermann JS, Jones AA, Buser D, School-field J, Cochran DL., The effect of a machined collar on coronal hard tissue around titanium implants: a radio-graphic study in the canine mandible. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2003 Jun;14(3):251-62
16 Gigandet M1, Bigolin G, Faoro F, Bürgin W, Brägger U. Implants with original and non-original abutment connections. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2014 Apr;16(2):303-11. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2012.00479.x. Epub 2012 Jul 16.
17 Joda T, Bürki A, Bethge S, Brägger U, Zysset P. Stiffness, strength, and failure modes of implant-supported monolithic lithium disilicate crowns: influence of titanium and zirconia abutments. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2015 Nov-Dec;30(6):1272-9. doi: 10.11607/jomi.3975.
18 Kajiwara N, Masaki C, Mukaibo T, Kondo Y, Nakamoto T, Hosokawa R. Soft tissue biological response to zirconia and metal implant abutments compared with natural tooth: microcirculation monitoring as a novel bioindicator. Implant Dent 2015;24(1):37-41
19 Heberer S, Kilic S, Hossamo J, Raguse J-D, Nelson K Patients treated with dental implants after surgery and radio- chemotherapy of oral cancer.. Rehabilitation of irradiated patients with modified and conventional sandblasted, acid-etched implants: preliminary results of a split-mouth study. Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 22, 2011; 546–551.
20 C. Nack, J.-D. Raguse, A. Stricker, K. Nelson & S. Nahles. Rehabilitation of irradiated patients with chemically modified and conventional SLA implants: five-year follow-up. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation 2015 42; 57—64.
21 Nelson, K., Stricker, A., Raguse, J.-D. and Nahles, S. (2016), Rehabilitation of irradiated patients with chemically modified and conventional SLA implants: a clinical clarification. J Oral Rehabil, 43: 871–872. doi:10.1111/joor.12434.
22 Tonetti MS, Lang NP, Cortellini P, Suvan JE, Adriaens P, Dubravec D, Fonzar A, Fourmousis I, Mayfield L, Rossi R, Silvestri M, Tiedemann C, Topoll H, Vangsted T, Wallkamm B. Enamel matrix proteins in the regenerative therapy of deep intrabony defects. J Clin Periodontol. 2002 Apr;29(4):317-25.
23 Pilloni A, Paolantonio M, Camargo PM. Root coverage with a coronally positioned flap used in combination with enamel matrix derivative: 18-month clinical evaluation. J Periodontol. 2006 Dec;77(12):2031-9
24 McGuire MK, Scheyer ET, Nunn M. Evaluation of human recession defects treated with coronally advanced flaps and either enamel matrix derivative or connective tissue: comparison of clinical parameters at 10 years. J Periodontol. 2012 Nov;83(11):1353-62.