Case study: patient-friendly with digital impressions
Matthes’s first case involved an esthetic anterior correction before prosthetic treatment. The dentist explains: “The 62-year-old patient wanted a new treatment with ceramic crowns in her upper incisors for 12, 11 and 21 and 22. The teeth had been endodontically treated at a different practice about a year and a half ago following trauma to the front teeth and had been reconstructed with plastic, which had already partially splintered away.
The clinical findings in both the upper and lower jaws revealed crowding, with vestibular displacement of tooth 21 and moderate overlapping of the lower incisors. The prosthetic baseline was not ideal. To achieve the best esthetic outcome possible, and as the patient has high esthetic demands, I recommended an orthodontic pre-prosthetic therapy with clear aligners, to create enough space for the preparation so it can hold the crown. The patient consented that she should have the orthodontic treatment before the prosthetic restoration, for which we factored in about six months, and in August 2019 X-rays and photographs were taken (anterior and profile views and the occlusal view of the maxilla and mandible). The situation scans of the upper and lower jaws were also taken with the 3Shape Trios Intraoral scanner.”
The conventional method of taking impressions of the upper and lower jaws can, in essence, be used to produce the aligners; however, ClearCorrect offers the option of a digital workflow, which is “both user-friendly and patient-friendly,” explains Matthes. “The modern alternative to conventional impression taking is also much more comfortable for patients; there is no gagging or unpleasant taste, with shorter treatment times, as the impression can be taken with precision and speed.” When it comes to prosthetic treatments, adds Matthes, who now uses digital impressions for almost all her prosthetic patient cases (“I only take a conventional approach for removable prosthetics”), “it improves communication between the patient, the dentist and the dental technician.” At this point, she emphasizes that “you need a decent lab that knows its way around digital workflows. Distance is no obstacle. Our dental lab, “Echt Eppers” is in Hildesheim, more than 300 kilometers (185 miles) away – but everything still runs perfectly and it also means there is no chain of infection; a valuable asset in these times of corona.”
Even if aligner creation is not about imaging the preparation margins: “Even here, for simple situation scans, where you are mapping the dental situation, it is really important to make sure the mirror and lenses are clean” - practical advice from the dentist who has been working with Trios since 2017. “Mirrors that don’t reflect anything after they are sterilized so many times, are - to put it simply - a waste of time.” The photo and scan data are then uploaded as an STL file via the 3Shape portal, from where the state-of-the-art production site for the ClearCorrect aligners in Texas*, USA, can then open the scans. “Then I enter information in the computer on the selected treatment methods, including information on whether an approximal enamel reduction is planned, or if the use of engagers, attachments or aids for specific tooth movements, are approved,” she explains.
Then the data are analyzed and a treatment simulation is created. “I looked at it with the patient, and she was able to follow the phases on the monitor and see what tooth movements were planned for the next six months.” This preview can also be forwarded directly to the patient as a link. Then the customized ClearCorrect aligners are manufactured specifically for the patient based on the treatment plan. Matthes: “The treatment plan consisted of eight aligners for the upper and lower jaws. In week 4, five attachments or engagers were added in both the upper and lower teeth to aid treatment.” There were check-ups every four to six weeks. After around six months the treatment was completed. “The patient wore the last pair of aligners as retainers at night.” As the front teeth in the mandible exhibited grade I mobility, we decided to wait with the next step. A few weeks after the preliminary orthodontic therapy, there was no movement in the lower anterior teeth, and so the preparation of the upper teeth could be terminated.