#Education 17. Mar 2026

Zirconia implants: 10-year multicenter study

A selected scientific recommendation by Dr. Marcin Maj: "Long -Term Clinical, Radiographic and Esthetic Outcomes of Zirconia Dental Implants: A 10 -Year Prospective Multicenter Study" by S Roehling, K H Bormann, M M Bornstein, S Laval, F Thieringer, M Gahlert.

STUDY OBJECTIVES AND METHODS

This study aimed to prospectively investigate the long -term clinical performance of a commercially available one -piece zirconia dental implant system over 10 years. A multicenter, open -label study was conducted at three clinical centers in Germany. Forty -four patients with s ingle -tooth gaps meeting specific inclusion criteria received 44 yttria -stabilized zirconia (Y -TZP) implants featuring a sandblasted and acid -etched (ZLA) surface. Clinical and radiographic follow -ups were performed at 1, 3, 5, and 10 years to assess implant survival, success, peri -implant bone levels, and esthetic outcomes using Pink Esthetic Score (PES) and White Esthetic Score (WES). 


RESULTS

  • At the 10-year follow -up, 35 patients with 35 implants were available for evaluation. 
  • The estimated 10 -year survival rate was 97.7% (95% CI: 97.27 -98.13). Three implants (8.6%) showed biological complications, including peri -implant mucositis in 2 implants (5.7%) and peri -implantitis in 1 implant (2.9%), leading to a success rate of 91.4% ( 95% CI: 76.9 - 97.8).
  • Peri-implant bone loss was moderate, averaging 1.20 (±0.61) mm over 10 years, with stable bone levels observed after the initial remodeling phase.
  • Esthetic outcomes revealed a slight increase in PES (7.4 to 7.8) and a minor decrease in WES (7.0 to 6.7) between years 5 and 10.

 

CONCLUSIONS

Zirconia implants demonstrated high long -term survival and success rates, moderate bone loss, and favorable esthetic outcomes. These findings support their use as a clinically reliable and esthetically acceptable long -term alternative to titanium implants. However, the limited sample size highlights the need for further confirmation in larger cohorts. Adapted from S Roehling et al., J Prosthet Dent. 2025 May 3:S0022 -3913(25)00358-0, for more info about this publication, click HERE.

This review is part of the Straumann "Scientific Highlights Newsletter 1/26".


More studies:

  • One-Year Analysis of Clinical and Radiological Outcomes of Two-Piece Zirconia Compared to Titanium Implants: A Multicenter Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial
  • Osteogenic Differentiation on Nonthermal Atmospheric Plasma-Treated versus SLActive® Titanium and Titanium-Zirconium Implants: An In Vitro Comparative Study
  • The Effect of Age and Use of Enamel Matrix Derivative on Implant Loss
  • Impact of Zirconia and Titanium Implant Surfaces of Different Roughness on Oral Epithelial Cells
  • Impact of Two Implant-Abutment Connection Types on Crestal Bone Stability: A 3-Year Comparative Split-Mouth Clinical Trial
  • Full-Arch Implant Rehabilitation Integrating Mandibular Movement Records Using Complete Digital Workflows: A Case Report
  • Clinical evaluation and bone loss prediction of titanium-zirconium implants: A retrospective study of 1-5-year follow-up
  • Scientific evaluation of design and surface advances in Straumann implants