And, based on your biomaterials expertise, where do you see the future of Emdogain?
Finding different applications for the same product means thinking out of the box. I don’t know if the rest of the applications 25 years from now will remain as effective as Emdogain® used nowadays for periodontal reconstructions. We’ll see. Since Emdogain® enhances healing, we can use it in different situations such as implant surgery, perio treatments or bone grafting procedures. Thanks to Emdogain®, we are now able to treat patients who were previously considered untreatable. Of course, as a result, others have thought about creating something with a similar application as Emdogain®, but, so far without much success. Even growth factors like PDGF or BMP failed to achieve a similar result.
With implants it was like a pendulum: at some point many clinicians extracted teeth to place implants. Then, when implants started to have problems, the focus was back on saving teeth. And Straumann® Emdogain® helps when it comes to saving teeth!
How would you answer the provocative question about whether it is worth saving teeth?
If a tooth is extracted due to periodontal reasons, especially in young people, implant placement does not solve the issue. Nowadays we know that we are actually replacing one problem with another. Patients with a history of periodontitis from an early age have a higher risk for peri-implantitis. Such patients may start to experience peri-implant problems after 10 years, and implants will usually have to be retrieved and new ones placed due to bone deficiency. These cycles are very challenging for the patient and the treating clinician. On the other hand, today we know how to treat periodontitis, but don’t really know how to treat peri-implantitis.
What about the future of esthetic dentistry?
To me esthetic dentistry does not exist: it’s either good dentistry or bad dentistry. Implants are an excellent tool to replace teeth that have been lost or that we have been forced to extract. Tooth support is much more predictable than implant support. We never plan to fail, we fail because we do not plan.
You are in contact with clinicians from all over the world. What do you think dentists should do more and what less?
The main reason for tooth extraction today is the practitioner’s decision! A lot of teeth are extracted since the dentists are not fully acquainted with the possibilities of periodontal treatment. By trying to save the teeth, we could provide a much better service for patients, especially younger patients, even though the treatment will take time. My concept is that we should first try to preserve and decide to extract only if there are no alternative options to save the teeth.
Can you share with us one of the best pieces of advice that you received?
Yes, it’s something that my mother told me. When you have occlusive trauma there are three mechanisms that work together. One is the PDL, the second is the muscle and the last is the TMJ. Something must fail because a lot of forces are involved. Either you have the teeth that are gone, muscle tenderness, ground teeth or a temporomandibular joint problem. Something has to fail.
Would you like to share anything else with our readers?
We have several websites that can be visited. One of the best platforms would be Researchgate, where you can see who works with whom and what are the most recent publications. My last two recently published books are mentioned there. I would encourage your readers to approach me or my team and ask for the publications, since knowledge should be shared and transferring knowledge is important for me!