Straumann® Bone Level ImplantS

Flexible implants for proven esthetics.



The Straumann® Bone Level implants were designed for a natural look and feel, providing great flexibility and a balanced prosthetic portfolio for every indication, including immediacy. They stand for excellent clinical performance, outstanding esthetics and high patient satisfaction in daily practice1. Furthermore, our cutting-edge implant technologies Roxolid® and SLActive® add reduced invasiveness and maximized predictability and treatment success.


Reduced invasiveness

Reduced invasiveness thanks to the use of smaller implants with our high-performance material Roxolid®.2-5

Treatment success

High predictability, shorter healing times and enhanced bone regeneration even at compromised sites with our SLActive® surface.6-8

Esthetics

Outstanding esthetic results with Consistent Emergence Profiles™ soft tissue management and a balanced prosthetic portfolio with iEXCEL bone level implants.


Straumann® iEXCEL Bone level implants

Straumann® iEXCEL is our ultimate Dental Performance System. Versatility of four implant designs in a single system. Simplicity of one prosthetic connection. Integrated digital workflows and services that help save your time.




Other Bone Level implants



Featured stories on youTooth


Scientific evidence

Looking for more scientific evidence? You'll find it in the here.

Contact us

Data usage agreement*

Read our privacy notice.

Please retype the code above

References

1 Filippi A, Higginbottom FL, Lambrecht T, Levin BP, Meier JL, Rosen PS, Wallkamm B, Will C, Roccuzzo M.: A prospective noninterventional study to document implant success and survival of the Straumann® Bone Level SLActive® dental implant in daily dental practice. Quintessence Int. 2013;44(7):499 2 Straumann: Scientific Review for Straumann® Bone Level SLActive® Implants, Art.-No. 490.009
2 Bernhard N et al. Forum Implantologicum 2009; 5(1): 30-39
3 Hotchkiss KM et al. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2017 Apr;28(4):414-423
4 Al-Nawas B. et al. J Oral Implantol. 2015 Aug;41(4):e118-25
5 Chiapasco M. et al. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012 Oct;23(10):1136-41
6 Alsahhaf A et al. Survival of Titanium-Zirconium and Titanium Dental Implants in Cigarette-smokers and Never-smokers: A 5-Year Follow-up. Chin J Dent Res. 2019;22(4):265-272
7 Cabrera-Domínguez JJ, Castellanos-Cosano L, Torres-Lagares D, Pérez-Fierro M, Machuca-Portillo G. Clinical performance of titanium-zirconium implants with a hydrophilic surface in patients with controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus: 2-year results from a prospective case-control clinical study. Clin Oral Investig. 2020 Jul;24(7):2477-2486
8 Nelson, K., Stricker, A., Raguse, J.-D. and Nahles, S. (2016), Rehabilitation of irradiated patients with chemically modified and conventional SLA implants: a clinical clarification. J Oral Rehabil, 43: 871 -872